Hubbard column: It’s not complicated – Michael is simply being Michael

The sports world spent most of two decades witnessing the savage competitiveness that was Michael Jordan and, frankly, not only enjoyed it, but also idolized it. When he was a player and got that nasty, comic book-superhero look in his eyes while staring down a challenger, everyone – with the notable exception of opponents – loved it.

That includes, you’ve got to think, all current players.

For Jordan, games were combat, a test of wills, and he elevated them to levels that teetered between exhilarating and unhealthy. When Jordan became involved in a gambling controversy, it was his father who famously said his son did not have a gambling problem; he had a competition problem.

In 1992, a few of us got a glimpse of the raw Jordan – one that teammates saw daily and opponents saw nightly – while the Dream Team was in Monte Carlo preparing for the Barcelona Olympics. In a scrimmage that has become known as the greatest game never filmed, the Dream Team was divided into two squads – one led by Magic Johnson; the other by Jordan.

By the time the 10 or so media members who were covering the team got into the small arena, where the Dream Team had played a game in front of the royal family of Monte Carlo a couple of nights earlier, Jordan’s team had the lead and he was being quite vocal about it.

We learned later that Magic’s team had jumped out to a 14-2 lead and Magic and Charles Barkley began taunting Jordan. Ultimately, however, it wasn’t enough that Jordan answered by bringing his team back to victory; he was intent on loudly shoving the triumph through their ear drums.

Grabbing a can of Gatorade, he raised it over his head and repeated the famous line from his commercial at the time, “Sometimes I dream!” He made a victory lap around the floor. The rest of the players from both teams could only watch the performance.

By the time Jordan finally sat, most of the writers had surrounded Magic and Barkley to get statements from the losers and for a moment, I was alone with Jordan. At that point, he seemed to snap out of the competitive trance he was in and almost got a little sheepish.

“How’s your boy,” he said, referring to his good friend Barkley.

I answered that Barkley, another legendary competitor, was pretty embarrassed and irritated.

“He’ll get over it,” Jordan said.

At that point, I shook my head and fumbled for words to ask him why he was making such a spectacle. All I could come up with was, “I guess you just have to win.”

Without pausing, Jordan snapped back, “I try to make a habit out of it.”

That is merely one episode during of a career of fanatic competitiveness. The trait that is signature Jordan is something critics have forgotten during the last week when Jordan has been widely condemned for taking a hard-line position in collective bargaining talks with the players.

Some have wondered loudly and harshly; how is that possible? Here is a guy who was the ultimate player. Here is a guy who once told Washington owner Abe Pollin during negotiations to sell his team if he could not afford labor costs. And now Jordan is leading a group to force players to accept less money?

The answer to that riddle is not complicated.

Jordan is no longer a player.

He is an owner.

He has changed teams.

He plays for the other side.

And he is trying to win.

It is no different than Jordan joining the Wizards late in his playing career. He had won six titles with the Bulls. Was he supposed to not try hard when Washington played Chicago?

Make no mistake that Jordan approved the NBA identifying him as leader of the hard-line owners last week. The message was very clear to the players. It was the same message he repeatedly sent to the Knicks, Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Blazers, Jazz, Suns and every other team when he was a player. It was the same message he sent to his buddies Magic and Charles in Monte Carlo.

I want to crush you.

Does that make him a phony or a sellout because of his current stance? I’ve got a question for Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and all others offended by Jordan’s presence on his current team of owners:

If you eventually purchase a team, is it your goal to increase labor costs? Or will you try to make your franchise as profitable as possible?

There is, of course, a flip side for Jordan. Players who are currently in their 20s have idolized him since they left diapers. There has been no greater honor for many of them than to be asked by Michael Jordan to wear the Jordan Brand of athletic wear.

There will be a fallout. Some have already talked about refusing to wear Jordan apparel.

And Jordan took some shots from union head Billy Hunter on Tuesday with Hunter saying Jordan should practice what he once preached to Pollin — if he can’t afford the Bobcats, sell. “He should take his own advice,” Hunter said.

Jordan, however, has undoubtedly come to terms with the potential repercussions. But he has made the determination that for his Charlotte franchise to be successful on the court and profitable off of it in a small market, the hard line is the correct line.

And besides, this is about winning.

I’m not sure what players or members of the media expected when NBA owners and the players association squared off against each other. But if they expected Jordan to suit up for the opposition, they didn’t pay attention to his career.

If there is a need to attach negative labels to Jordan and call him names, I’m sure it results in a big shrug from him. Say what you want, agree or disagree, but I think Jordan was being consistent. When he was a player, he tried to crush the owners. As an owner, he now wants to crush the players.

That’s vintage Jordan. That’s Michael being Michael.

Jan Hubbard has written about basketball since 1976 and worked in the NBA league office for eight years in between media stints. His columns will appear every Tuesday on SheridanHoops.com. Follow him on Twitter at @whyhub.

 

Share the Love
Breaking News

Comments

  1. ignarus says

    Just because it’s not complicated doesn’t make MJ any less of a hypocrite. He says whatever suits him with no concern for whatever principles he’s conveniently supported in the past.

    Though I feel a *little* bad talking smack about him when Stern will fine him hundreds of thousands for saying anything in his defense.

  2. Tony says

    I am one of the biggest Jordanphiles alive and have often cackled gleefully at the stories of his legendary, almost unhealthy, competitiveness (in college, cheating Buzz Peterson’s mom at cards…bribing some baggage carousel employees to put his bag out first to win a bet against teammates…during the 92 Olypmics, getting Chuck Daly up at 5 am for another round of golf after losing to him the previous day…and the list goes on). And Jan, I completely agree with your take on the situation. MJ just always needs to win, no matter the cost.

    That said, given that I love the game even more than I love MJ and can barely stomach the thought of there being no season…there is a part of me that wishes he could’ve taken a bit more of a productive role in this. It would probably have been anti-MJ to do something like this, but is there anyone else that thinks it might’ve been helpful for him to step into one of these meetings, pull the players aside and say frankly, “Look guys…I’ve been where you are. And yes, I was demanding certain things back then. But I’m on the other side of the fence now, and I’ve realized that there’s a different side to this whole thing. We need you guy to give some back, and then we can work together to make sure the league as a whole makes even more money.” If he had done something like that, I’m pretty sure that the players — probably 90% of whom grew up idolizing him — might’ve at least listened.

  3. atilaneron says

    I think it is pretty obvious. When he played for WW, he surely wanted to beat and even humiliate his former Chicago team…This is the same. And the player’s atitude of even complaining of this is a evidence of how childish they can be.

  4. Tim says

    What about an on-court boycott from the players? Forget boycotting the Jordan Brand. What if large groups of players come out and say “we won’t sign with any of the hardline owners, now and in the future”. Doesn’t this hardline stance hamper their ability to recruit players?

  5. Ryan Mascaro says

    @ Jacob:

    The previous CBA’s didn’t seem to hamper Jordan’s ability to make record annual salaries of 30 and 33 million in his last 2 years with the Bulls. On strict BRI, you’re right. But considering he is the highest paid athlete in NBA History (annually), I doubt he’s the “perfect person to bring them back in touch with reality”. The current max salary (without bird rights) in this last CBA is half that.

    • Rob says

      That’s not entirely true. Max salaries are based off of years of service. For LeBron, Wade and the like, the max is around $15 million, but look at Kobe’s pay schedule for the next 3 seasons:

      2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
      Kobe Bryant $25,244,493 $27,849,149 $30,453,805

  6. Jacob says

    Wow. Great column. So you are telling me that there is absolutely no footage of that game? No grainy still shot? Thats a sheer tragedy.

    Here is another ironic thing about all the criticism MJ is receiving: The deal he wants, the one that supposedly makes him such a hardliner and hypocrite, is still way better than the deals he played under and better than the labor deals in every other major pro sport. I call it a gravy train, one that the players have been on for so long now they don’t realize how good they had it. Jordan is the perfect person to bring them back in touch with reality.

    • Jan Hubbard says

      No footage from the game. There is footage from players warming up, but that’s all that has been found — at least last time I checked — Jan

  7. Ryan Mascaro says

    “Republicans buy shoes too.” – Michael Jordan

    While you’re right on with Jordan’s all encompassing need to dominate, there is a precedent for him hiding his opinions from the limelight when it comes to money and business. He can be pushing a hardline in owners only meetings as much as he wants, but what’s the advantage here to being the face of the hardline opposition? His credibility IS his business model. He and Nike wrote the book on staying above the fray when it came to controversial opinions, regardless of how he actually felt.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] [To read original column on Sheridanhoops.com, click here] Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← Practice Is Real Thing; Fired-up Jordan takes over intense scrimmage A Sure Way to Upset Larry Bird → [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>