Bernucca: Despite split, Spurs may be in trouble

duncanThe San Antonio Spurs might be in trouble.

On the surface, things appear to be OK. The Spurs have executed their defensive game plan, which is to turn LeBron James into a passer. They have prevented the Miami Heat from turning either game into an extended relay race. And most important, they secured a split of the first two games as the road team, which is practically mandatory in the 2-3-2 format of the NBA Finals.

Beneath the surface, however, the Spurs are one spectacular clutch shot from being in an 0-2 hole and facing the specter of a must-win Game 3. And unless they want to be facing a must-win Game 4, the Spurs have to find quick fixes for a number of issues.

“If you look at the result, being 1-1, it’s not bad,” Spurs guard Manu Ginobili said. “But you don’t want to play like this in an NBA Finals. You don’t want to give them that much confidence, and you feeling bad about yourself.”

Some of San Antonio’s problems are team-wide, such as pace and ball security. Others are individual, such as the collective play of their stars.

And it’s fair to expect that a week of sleeping in their own beds will allow the Spurs to relax a bit, which should somewhat raise their level of play.

But it has to get better. And fast.

1. Ball security. Much was made of San Antonio’s four turnovers in Game 1, which tied an NBA Finals record. So perhaps as much should be made of the 17 turnovers the Spurs committed in Game 2, which is more than Miami’s combined total for the first two games.

Six of those turnovers came during Miami’s monstrous 33-5 run, which illustrates why San Antonio must take care of the ball. But it wasn’t the Spurs committing turnovers that led to the Heat getting into their transition game; it was the Heat ratcheting up their defense that led to the Spurs committing turnovers. San Antonio succumbed to the pressure.

“If we can keep our turnovers under 10, it would be better against that team,” said Spurs guard Tony Parker, who had zero giveaways in Game 1 and five in Game 2. “Because every time you have turnovers, it’s a quick fast break.”

Not every time. But often. Which leads us to …

2. Pace. As most teams do, the Spurs like to run to increase their opportunities for easy baskets. For San Antonio, it is less about getting breakaway layups or 2-on-1 situations and more about the secondary break, where it can take advantage of cross matches, use transition pick-and-rolls and fan shooters to the arc.

However, the last thing the Spurs want to do is get into a prolonged track meet with the Heat, who absolutely thrive in the open court. Striking a balance is tough, so San Antonio seems content to rely on precision over pace.

Through the first two games, however, the numbers seem to indicate that slowing things down isn’t Dwyane Wadeworking that well. While the Spurs have limited the Heat to 22 fast-break points, they have managed just seven themselves. That is a paltry 4 percent of their offense. In the regular season, fast breaks generated 13.5 percent of their offense.

While pace always slows in the postseason, the Spurs are getting less than two easy baskets per game vs. the Heat. When half-court sets have to produce virtually all of your offense, that demands that your execution and shot-making are near optimum levels.

Which they have not been.

3. Shooting. During the season, San Antonio shot 48 percent. In the playoffs, the Spurs have expectedly dipped slightly to 46 percent. But against the Heat, they are shooting just 41 percent.

Surprisingly, the biggest culprits are the “Big Three” of Parker, Ginobili and Tim Duncan, who have taken exactly half San Antonio’s shots thus far. Collectively, they are shooting just 38 percent (31-of-81) from the field, including a miserable 10-of-33 in Game 2.


  1. says

    La timidité n’est pas un défaut, elle est un atout. Lire les livres d’Elaine Aron « The Highly Sensitive Person (Ces Gens Qui Ont Peur D’avoir Peur) » pour comprendre que ce trait de caractere a été dévalorisé par une société guerrière, macho, entrepeneuriale etc. Cette auteure aurait du être mentionnée dans l’article.

  2. says

    I was very pleased to search out this web-site.I needed to thanks for your time for this glorious read!! I positively having fun with every little bit of it and I’ve you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you weblog post.

  3. says

    je n’ai pas eu un changement de juge n’avait pas encore, mais c’est ma compréhension que le système fonctionnera toujours avec tous les onduleurs d’autres, si vous échouez. Cela signifie qu’une défaillance onduleur assommer un seul des 18 panneaux et laisser les autres 17 Arbeitstage.Ein Un autre avantage est l’onduleur le toit qu’il simplifie le câblage. Il s’agit d’un circuit simple 240V/30A sur le toit et je n’ai pas besoin d’un câble lourd pour les panneaux à courant continu. Merci pour le commentaire!

  4. says

    It is so important that companies view themselves as members of our local, national, and global communities.  Thank you Tyson Foods for taking on the responsibility of being a community member.  I hope you will continue to give back, with all that you are given. 

  5. Raymond Settles says

    C’mon, Chris. The Spurs were 1-1 in Miami with 2 poor shooting games. You had to know they would get untracked shooting the rock, and well… Game 3 happens. Manu wakes up (for at least this game), LeBron is flustered as far as figuring out where his scoring is to come from. Wade is a 1 half kind of impact player for now, and Bosh, I kinda feel bad for. Anyway, this series is going at least 6 games and I close with… Go Spurs!

  6. Keith Martin says

    That is okay…people have been writing the Spurs obituary for a long time now…no surprise here…they just keep proving the media wrong…let’s get game 3..Go Spurs Go!!!!!!!!!

  7. steppxxxz says

    cracks me up, after the first SPurs win, all the sports writers were writng “Heat in trouble”….then the heat win, and because they have to write SOMETHING….its “spurs might be in trouble”. Neither is true. I think three stragith at home is tough for Miami….unless joey crawford’s crew gets another game right away. San Antonio is the better team. But….they had miami tired, and a bit rattled at the start of the third….and they fell apart. Rarely do pop’s teams fall apart that way. I dont expect it to happen again. On the flip side..LeBron will figure to score more. A lot depends on if wade can hold up, because he is critical, as bosh is a dead loss. But…I favor Spurs in six…..these three straight are tough to imagine them losing more than one, if that.

    • says

      You always are pretty on with your comments, and I know there was an overall woe-is-them tone after Game 1 but I was not among that chorus. I though the Spurs made a couple more plays than the Heat down the stretch of a close game. As for how the rest plays out, Heat don’t need two in SA. They just need one, and based on history of middle 3 games they will get it. After that, Spurs have to play Game 6 like its Game 7, because LeBron will win Game 7 on home floor. But thanks for reading as always.

      • steppxxxz says

        forgive my snide tone……, the format becomes far too big an issue……..its terrible to do the 2-3-2……..and it does feel as if SA didnt really win back home court…..just how it feels. They did….but you’re quite right……..heat only need, and if they get it, they’ll feel comfortable. Im not sure they will though…..and i’ll stick with Spurs in six. No question game three means a lot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>