Heat-Pacers Preview: Five Key Factors

1 Comment

LeBron JamesWith defensive tenacity and a punishing, menacing front line, the Indiana Pacers have reached the Eastern Conference finals. But if vanquishing the New York Knicks in six games seemed like a tall task, their path to the NBA Finals seems preposterously gargantuan in comparison.

To defeat LeBron James in his prime and the Miami Heat in a best-of-seven series is akin to defeating a Michael Jordan-led Bulls team in his prime. James is the best player in the world. He has several “spacers” who can knock down open looks if he passes out of the double-team. And Miami still has two world-class talents in Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh. So any team is going to have trouble with the Heat.

But let’s face it: Miami’s path to the NBA’s final four hasn’t been all that difficult. After a hasty romp over the Milwaukee Bucks, they easily dispatched a Chicago Bulls team without its two best players. The Heat will likely face its first true postseason challenge in Indiana, where the Pacers possess key advantages over Miami that no other Eastern Conference team has.

pacers small logoRoy Hibbert and David West are monsters inside, acting as roadblocks and deterrents to any drivers (ask Carmelo Anthony). Paul George would have gotten this writer’s vote for Defensive Player of the Year. So this series could quite possibly be way too close for Miami’s comfort.

Here are five key factors going into Wednesday night’s series opener:

1. The LeBron Factor: To state the brutally obvious, this series hinges on how well the best player on the planet performs. Not to be an alarmist or anything, but James’ postseason stats are noticeably worse than they were during the regular season. This could be due to the low degree of difficulty Miami has faced in the playoffs, or some other excuse I could make up. But the historically prolific stats weren’t there during James’ first nine playoff games this season.

LeBron Min FG % 3 FG% Points Rebounds Assists
Season 37.9 56.5 40.6 26.8 8 7.3
Playoffs 39.4 51.8 32.1 24 7.3 7.3

LeBron’s shots have gone slightly down, but his shooting percentages are down overall and way down from the 3-point arc. Indiana has one of the best defenses in the NBA, so a continued dip in James’ shooting could have a larger impact than it did during the first two rounds.

LeBron James Min FG % 3 FG% Points Rebounds Assists
Season vs IND 40.3 51.1 50 21 7.3 4.7


2. The interior muscle factor: 
Roy Hibbert and David West are two bad, bad men who take opponents out of their comfort zones inside. Hibbert has averaged 9.6 rebounds and 2.5 blocks in the playoffs while shooting 47.3 percent from the field (compared to 44.8 percent during the regular season), improving on both ends of the field after he was heavily criticized for his offense.

But it’s on the defensive end where these two really make the largest impact. Indiana has allowed opponents to shoot 41.6 percent from the field during the playoffs (third to only Boston, who couldn’t beat the Knicks, and Miami, whose competition wasn’t overly great) and allow 89.4 points per game on 1.12 points per shot (dead even with the Heat in the latter department).

Where the Pacers really stand out is in the rebounding department. Indiana leads all playoff teams in total rebounds, defensive rebounds, offensive rebounds and a plus-9.8 per game edge. That’s an enormous advantage on the glass that you should definitely watch out for.

3. The Paul George Factor: Carmelo Anthony shot just 43.3 percent during the conference semifinals against the Pacers, well below his 46.9 percent season average, and scored 1.14 points per shot against Indiana compared with 1.35 during the regular season. A lot of that had to do with the disruptive defense from George, who had the most defensive win shares during the regular season and should have won the Defensive Player of the Year award. He has the ability to play tough perimeter defense against James as Indiana tries to somehow curtail his production.

If his defensive abilities weren’t enough, George has led Indiana in scoring during the playoffs at 19.1 points to go with five assists. As influential as Hibbert is for Indiana, George will be more important on both sides of the floor if the Pacers have any shot.

4. The Point Guard Factor: George Hill played in Indiana’s Game 6 win over the Knicks, returning from a concussion but shooting just 2-for-10. If he can come back at full strength, that could be another area where the Pacers have an overall leg up on the Heat. Hill is an upgrade over D.J. Augustin, who somehow did not record a single assist in Games 4 and 5 despite logging 60 total minutes.

On the Miami side, the emerging storyline at point guard is the rise of Norris Cole, who is clearly outperforming Mario Chalmers on the offensive end. Cole is shooting over 60 percent from the field overall and 68.8 percent from the arc, and is now playing over 22 minutes per game in the playoffs to Chalmers’ 26. It will be interesting to see how Erik Spoelstra divvies up his minutes during the series.

5. The Bench Factor: Miami’s bench is really good. Indiana’s? Not so much. While Miami’s reserves outscored Chicago’s in all five games in the second round (though the Bulls were badly depleted by injury and illness), Indiana’s bench scored fewer points than New York in each of their six contests. The Pacers were trounced 31-8 in Game 6 and 35-10 in Game 5.

Lance Stephenson’s ascent to the starting lineup may have something to do with that, but when you compare the likes of Augustin, Ian Mahinmi, Sam Young and Tyler Hansbrough with the likes of Cole, Ray Allen, Shane Battier, Chris Andersen (and others), you could tell that bench production could (and probably will) be a pretty large factor in this series.

PREDICTIONS: 

 SHERIDAN: Heat in 7.

HUBBARD: Heat in 7.

HEISLER: Heat in 6.

BERNUCCA: Heat in 6.

HAMILTON: Heat in 6

PeterMay.MAY: Heat in 6.

PERKINS: Heat in 5.

schayesSCHAYES: Heat in 6.

andykamenetzkyANDY KAMENETZKY: Heat in 7.

briankamenetskyBRIAN KAMENETZKY: Heat in 6.

ZAGORIA: Heat in 6.

PARK: Heat in 6.

Abrams: Western Conference Finals Betting Preview

Leave a comment

The evolution of the Memphis Grizzlies franchise since its infant days in Vancouver is really something to marvel at when you consider where they are as of today.

They are currently on their 7th head coach in their franchise’s history with Lionel Hollins and are out of the first round for just the second time in their 18-year history. If you parlay that with the fact that Memphis traded their top scorer, Rudy Gay, at the end of January for Ed Davis, who has played 3 total minutes in the past six games, Austin Daye, who has played 11 total minutes in the entire playoffs and an aging 33-year old Tayshaun Prince, who is the best current piece of the deal, you have to be impressed with their run.

Sheridan: Empty 39 for ‘Melo, and WTF Woody?

8 Comments

Mike_Woodson_KnicksSome quick thoughts on the New York Knicks’ loss to the Indiana Pacers, who are going to give the Miami Heat some problems but will lose the Eastern Conference finals if they shoot free throws and have as many unforced turnovers as they did against the Knicks.

First of all, Carmelo Anthony will not live this one down for a long time. He was 0-for-5 in the fourth quarter with two turnovers before making his first shot of the final period. As I discussed with Adam The Bull in the podcast below on CBS Sports Radio, that’s not the kind of thing that happens to LeBron James. (It used to, but it doesn’t anymore).

On the subject of Woodson, I don’t really have a major problem with him sitting Amare Stoudemire and Jason Kidd throughout the second half, but it leaves him open to some serious second-guessing. I thought he should have had Pablo Prigioni on the floor instead of Raymond (0-for-7) Felton down the stretch, and he overused J.R. Smith, IMHO.

Also, Woodson didn’t play the foul game during the final minute when he was out of timeouts but trailing by only four points. The Pacers had been missing free throws all night (they finished 34-for-46), and the Knicks needed the extra possessions that the fouling game would have produced.

Also, it bears mentioning that Marcus Camby did not sniff the floor in this series, not was he ever a factor all year. Glen Grunwald gave up a lot to get him, including Jared Jeffries, who I am astonished to say would have been more useful in this series than Camby or Stoudemire was.

More on the Knicks, the Pacers, and the Spurs-Grizzlies series in the broadcast with Adam the Bull below. Enjoy.

Listen to internet radio with Sheridan Hoops Radio on BlogTalkRadio

Spurs-Grizzlies Preview: Five Key Factors

Leave a comment

zach randolphUvo, take me back to 2011. (Sorry, I’ve been watching too many Blake Griffin commercials.)

Just two years ago, the eighth-seeded Grizzlies stunned the top-seeded Spurs in the first round of the playoffs, sending San Antonio back to its rocking chairs a little bit earlier than anyone expected.

Memphis used a breakout performance by Zach Randolph (31 points, 11 boards in Game 6) to close out the Spurs, then took the Thunder to seven games before bowing out in the West semifinals.

Back then, analysts like Stephen A. Smith used unnecessary big words to postulate that we were seeing the end of the great San Antonio dynasty. How erroneous those assertions were.

StatBox Playoff Breakdown: Knicks lucky to be alive and how San Antonio eliminated Golden State

1 Comment

The conference finals should be set. If not for Indiana’s horrid Thursday night performance against the Knicks, San Antonio’s Game 6 victory over Golden State would have ended the NBA’s second round. How did the Spurs end up taking the final game of what looked like an incredibly tight and engaging series?

Knicks are lucky to still be alive

Miami Heat v Indiana Pacers - Game FourLet’s not sugarcoat this: The Knicks are lucky to be in the playoffs right now, and are only still alive because the Pacers laid a complete egg in Thursday night’s Game 5 at Madison Square Garden.

Indiana shot 36.2 percent, missed 14 free throws and committed 19 turnovers in its 85-75 loss to New York, one it will want back if it somehow loses the next two games (and the series) to the Knicks.

“We’ve just got to play more solid. There’s no other way to put it,” Pacers coach Frank Vogel said. That’s putting it mildly.

The Indiana frontcourt of Roy Hibbert, David West and Paul George shot a combined 17-for-42 and the Pacers still only lost by 10. The Knicks didn’t really help themselves in any way either. Consider these facts:

  • New York got VoluMelo instead of Carmelo Anthony, with the Knicks star shooting 12-for-28 from the field while only attempting four free throws.
  • Despite forcing 19 turnovers and finishing a plus-eight on that front, Indiana still scored more points off turnovers, 14, than the Knicks’ 12.
  • The Knicks were out-rebounded by three and took 16 fewer free throws than the Pacers, but won because Indiana totally coughed up the game.

woodson“I was totally impressed because we met the challenge,” Knicks coach Mike Woodson said. “I think as a coach you come into games like this and you want to see who’s going to step up and make plays, and I thought we did that tonight. We were the better team in terms of doing that.”

Did Woodson watch the same game everyone else did? The Knicks, other than Chris Copeland, who Woodson decided to finally play after exhausting all his other options, and Kenyon Martin were pretty dreadful offensively. J.R. Smith shot 4-for-11 and was praised for his strong performance, truly indicating that Smith’s standards have been lowered. Ima Shumpert shot 2-for-10, Pablo Prigioni has been marginalized, and the Knicks only won because no Indiana player shot better than 50 percent from the field besides for Ian Mahinmi, who hit both his field goal attempts.

The Knicks could choose to look at this game through rose-colored glasses, but it’s extremely unlikely that Indiana will play this poorly at home on Saturday night. Unless Woodson and his team get its act together, reality will quickly strike and end New York’s season. They’re truly fortunate to still be in this series.

How San Antonio eliminated Golden State

Stephen Curry On Sunday, Golden State seemed to have figured San Antonio out with a rousing overtime win to knot the series at two games apiece. Several Warriors were making crucial contributions, there was teamwork, balance and perseverance. Some Sheridan Hoops guy even wrote a column about how Golden State had a realistic chance of beating the vaunted Spurs.

So what changed over the last two games? Two key Golden State players basically ran out of gas.

As much as Stephen Curry has deserved the heaping helpings of praise he’s received this postseason, it was clear his ankle hindered the hobbling star enough to really affect the Warriors. Take a look at his splits from the first four games to the final two games of the series:

Curry Minutes FG % 3 FG % Points Assists FTA
Games 1-4 45.5 42.5 41 26 6.75 4.25
Games 5-6 37.5 35.9 20 15.5 7 0

Andrew Bogut Tim DuncanThe minutes played are distorted because of the two overtime games in the first four, but Curry’s huge drop-off in 3-point field goal percentage and points scored can be logically attributed to his ankle injuries. As sensational of a player Curry is, he needed to be the focal point of Golden State’s offense to have a chance to knock off the Spurs. He didn’t shoot a single free throw over the final two games, a stat that encapsulates his limitations on Tuesday and Thursday.

The other major factor in the Warriors’ demise is the Andrew Bogut injury finally catching up to him. “I was running on fumes the whole series,” Bogut told the AP after Game 6. After averaging 15.4 rebounds in his previous five games, Bogut was limited to just 40 total minutes in games five and six. After going 2-for-5 with 18 rebounds in Game 4, he went 2-for-5 with 13 total rebounds in the last two contests combined.

It was a tremendous series for Golden State, but injuries to Curry and Bogut caught up with them and ultimately led to the Warriors’ unfortunate ouster.

Shlomo Sprung loves advanced statistics and the way they explain what happens on the court. He is also the web editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. A 2011 graduate of Columbia University’s Journalism School, he has previously worked for the New York Knicks, The Sporting News, Business Insider and other publications. His website is SprungOnSports.com. You can follow him on Twitter.