Spoelstra’s explanation for not using Bosh is scandalous

3 Comments

If you missed the postgame interviews, Miami coach Erik Spoelstra was asked why he left Chris Bosh on the bench for the entire fourth quarter of the Heat’s Game 5 loss to the Boston Celtics.

Spoelstra responded that it “wouldn’t have been fair” to Bosh to put him in for the final 3 minutes.

Hello?

Wouldn’t have been fair?

On what grounds? This was Game 5 of an even series, a fourth quarter in which the Heat were getting destroyed over and over and over again by Kevin Garnett down low, and Spoelstra had one of Miami’s “Big Three” available to him and chose not to use him — presumably because Bosh had missed nearly a month with a strained abdominal muscle, and hadn’t been in a crucial late-game situation for an even longer period of time.

Hello?

Is that not a scandalous answer?

Miami ended up getting nothing from LeBron James down the stretch and not enough from Dwyane Wade. Two of the biggest field goal attempts of the final stretch went to Mario Chalmers, who is a nice player but has never been considered a go-to scorer in close games, much less a talent worthy of “Big Three” status.

I’m not saying Bosh would have made the difference, but Miami was at its best in the regular season when Bosh, Udonis Haslem, James, Wade and Chalmers closed games. Even if it was a matchup issue and he only wanted to use one big, Bosh still would have been a superior option to Haslem, who was getting killed by KG and whose offensive repertoire is about one-tenth of Bosh’s.

That being said, who do I expect to win the series?

The answer is in the above video with CineSport’s Tara Petrolino.

Props to the Thunder, who showed they are a tight team

Leave a comment

Something you may not have known about the Oklahoma City Thunder: despite their relatively young age, they are about as tightly-knit of a group as there is in the entire NBA.

They hang out at each others’ houses. They are as much of a team on the court as hey are of of it. Their core has been together so long, including the most unheralded big player in this series, Nick Collison, that they have been able to summon a collective strength that few teams could muster.

They have had to play three perfect games to take a 3-2 lead over a San Antonio Spurs team that is still uberefficient offensively but has been exposed underneath for their lack of a low post last line of defense.

So should we count them out?

Are they gassed?

I answer those questions, and look ahead to tonight’s Game 5 in Miami, in this video with CineSport’s Tara Petrolino.

Hubbard: Spurs are on the ropes after Game 5 loss to Thunder

2 Comments

SAN ANTONIO – For the longest time, the San Antonio Spurs seemed so full of precision, so superior, so . . . invincible.

Fifty days. That’s how long the Spurs went without losing a game. Before them, only three teams in NBA history had winning streaks of 20 or more games. They became the fourth.

Included in that streak was eight straight in the playoffs. That number stretched to 10 when the Spurs handled the Thunder without significant problems in the first two games of the Western Conference finals. Manu Ginobili was brilliant in one, Tony Parker controlled the other and the Spurs went to Oklahoma City with visions of a sweep.

Well, their fans had such a vision. And some in the media foolishly had the same vision.

With three fantastic players and one shotblocker extraordinaire all 23 or under, the Thunder has for the last two years been the exciting team of the future.

And the young have proven to be restless. It would be an overstatement to suggest the Thunder shocked the Spurs with two victories in Oklahoma City, but it would accurately portray what happened Monday night when San Antonio’s losing streak shockingly reached three games — on their home floor, no less.

The Thunder survived a frenetic rally in the last six minutes of the game and defeated the Spurs 108-103, ending an 11-game home winning streak. Oklahoma City has a 3-2 lead in the series and will play Game 6 at home on Wednesday.

With many of the Heat and Celtics players hobbling in the Eastern finals, and with the superiority that the West has demonstrated throughout the season, the Thunder not only is in position to make its first NBA Finals since moving to Oklahoma City four years ago, but also suddenly is the favorite to win the title. And it is evident that they are interested in being the team of the present – not the future. Who knew?

“We never just thought that we were supposed to wait our turn,” Kevin Durant said. “We always wanted to go and take everything. Coach always emphasizes that every opportunity we step out on that floor is a great opportunity to get better and grow and fight towards our dreams.”

Although they have the impatience of youth, the Thunder also have steadily gained experience. They are participating in their seventh playoff series over the last three years, and the core of Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Serge Ibaka have been in each of those series.

Perhaps the pain the Thunder players have felt after playoff losses has not been as acute as pain felt by veteran players. But it is clear Oklahoma City has learned from it.

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the Thunder’s excellence is their confidence. They do not seem to get rattled, and that trait served them well again on Monday.

After a poor first half, the Spurs got a spark from Ginobili, who was inserted as a starter by San Antonio coach Gregg Popovich. Ginobili had 13 of his game-high 34 points in the third quarter and helped the Spurs build a six-point lead, which was their largest of the second half.

But Durant, as he has several times in the series, responded with brilliance of his own. He also had 13 points in the quarter, and in the last 5:40 of the period, the Thunder outscored the Spurs 20-5 to take a nine-point lead into the last quarter.

The Spurs tried to mount an attack but each time they made an effective play, the Thunder answered with one of their own. With 5:17 left in the game, Oklahoma City had a lead at 101-88 and seemed on the way to an easy victory.

But Tim Duncan led one final charge that included 11 consecutive points by the Spurs and ultimately was a 13-2 run. With 50.9 seconds left, a Duncan turnaround 7-foot bank shot – the last of his 11 points in the quarter – got the Spurs within two at 103-101.

The Thunder again did not wilt. Harden calmly tossed in a 3-point shot with 28.8 second left, and the Spurs would score only one more basket.

“We stuck together,” Oklahoma City coach Scott Brooks said. “We had a couple of bad stretches, but we didn’t break.”

The Spurs couldn’t say the same.

“I was disappointed in the lack of competitiveness overall in the first half,” Popovich said. “I was proud of them that they came back and dug down deep and competed in the second half. But we’ve been competing for three quarters in the last and tonight we competed for two quarters. If we don’t get that straight, it will be over Wednesday.”

The Thunder are 7-0 in the playoffs before their rollicking home crowd, and they will be playing for their dream Wednesday night.

For some people, their graduation to the elite level of the NBA came a little early. Apparently for the Thunder players, they are right on schedule.

Jan Hubbard has written about basketball since 1976 and worked in the NBA league office for eight years in between media stints with Newsday, The Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Follow him on Twitter at @whyhub.

 

 

Should LeBron James have passed the ball to Udonis Haslem?

7 Comments

Fair or unfair, we judge LeBron James on what he does in the final seconds of fourth quarters. He passed the ball instead of shooting it at the end of the 2012 All-Star game, he failed on a spectacular scale against the Dallas Mavericks in the fourth quarters of the 2011 NBA Finals, and his three MVP awards sit on a shelf alongside zero championship rings.

So when the end of the fourth quarter arrived Sunday night in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference finals against the Boston Celtics and James had the ball in his hands as the final seconds ticked down, everyone watching had their magic moment.

What would LeBron do?

The Celtics sent a second defender James’ way to cut him off as he made a move to his right, and James had a split-second to decide whether to keep going right, or to give up the rock. 

He turned and passed to Udonis Haslem, who was 20 feet away from the basket and had to force up a shot that never had a chance.

So here we are the day after, and that’s what everyone is talking about — including myself and CineSports’s Tara Petrolino in the above video.

Like I said, fair or unfair, this is the life James has chosen to live.

We judge our superstars by their clutch shots and their titles. LeBron has too few of both.