StatBox NBA Finals Breakdown: This time, it’s the backcourt leading the Spurs’ championship chase

Leave a comment

Manu GinobiliThe original Spurs championship team was based heavily on the frontcourt duo of David Robinson and Tim Duncan. Times have changed for San Antonio. While Duncan and Kawhi Leonard are integral parts of the Spurs’ team, of course, the team’s fortunes and outcomes in this year’s NBA Finals have been largely dictated by its backcourt.

While Danny Green has had a sensational NBA Finals, and would probably be named MVP if San Antonio ends up winning, the story in Game 5 were backcourt mainstays Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker. Ginobili had his first 24-point, 10-assist game in five years and Tony Parker was 10-f0r-10 within 10 feet of the basket, as San Antonio went on another third and fourth quarter run to defeat Miami 114-104 Sunday night.

“We are playing in the NBA Finals, we were 2-2, and I felt I still wasn’t really helping the team that much,” Ginobili said after the game. “And that was the frustrating part.”

Ginobili’s presence and role in the San Antonio offense has been, and will be, essential to the team’s success. Ginobili has played over 30 minutes twice this series and taken double-digit shots in those two games. Unsurprisingly, the Spurs won both those contests, Games 1 and 5. He took 11 total shots in the Spurs’ two defeats to Miami, and Gregg Popovich certainly realized that San Antonio would only win if Ginobili played a major role.

(RELATED: SHERIDAN COLUMN- Ginobili channels the past- or a pep talk- to give Spurs 3-2 lead)

Popovich inserted Ginobili into the starting lineup Sunday, and it was no coincidence that San Antonio became the first team to shoot at least 60 percent from the field in a Finals game since the 2009 Magic.

“He’s such a huge part of what we do and how far we’ve come. You can see it tonight in how we played and the results of the game,” Duncan said.

Tony ParkerParker’s presence was also felt the most in those first and fifth games, San Antonio wins. Those were the only games in which Parker played over 35 minutes, shot over 50 percent from the field and scored at least 20 points. He had 26 Sunday night on 10-for-14 shooting and made a determined effort to do his scoring damage near the hoop.

Parker is averaging over 21 points per game in the playoffs, but just over 16 in these Finals. San Antonio was fortunate enough to get great nights from Green and Gary Neal in the Game 3 blowout, but it’s been Parker’s scoring ability that helped propel the Spurs in their other two wins. But as important as Ginobili and Parker have been, another key backcourt member may be the Spurs’ most important piece of all.

Green has certainly had a historically brilliant NBA Finals, already setting the record for most 3-pointers made in a Finals series and threatening the all-time single-season playoff record, and he could be the biggest reason why the San Antonio Spurs hold a 3-2 series lead on the Miami Heat. He had 24 points on 8-for-15 shooting in Game 5.

When Green has been on his game offensively, the Spurs have defeated the Heat in this series. There’s no disputing that after checking out the splits:


Green Min FG % 3 FG% Points Assists Reb
Wins 34.67 53.8 60.7 21 0 5
Losses 33 64.3 80 13.5 2.5 2.5

Danny GreenHis field goal percentage has been much better in San Antonio’s two losses, but only because he’s been more tentative to shoot in those games. Green has averaged 13 shots in Spurs wins this series, compared to just seven in losses. He’s scoring 7 1/2 more points per game in wins than in losses, and is averaging 2 1/2 more rebounds in just 100 more seconds per game.

So it should come as no surprise that San Antonio is averaging over 106 points per game in wins and just over 85 points per game in losses. That’s an enormous disparity, and it’s largely due to the efforts of San Antonio’s indispensable backcourt trio that have taken unique paths and roles during the series.

We certainly expected Parker to be an impact player in the series, but did anyone expect Green to be the consensus pick for team MVP this series? And while Ginobili is surely up there in age, he virtually disappeared in three of the series’ five games. But in the most important Finals game this season to date, it was the Spurs’ backcourt that answered the call and excelled in the year’s highest leverage situation. For the Spurs to ultimately capture the championship, it will not be up to the big men to close out the series, but three guards who shined the brightest when it mattered the most.

Shlomo Sprung loves advanced statistics and the way they explain what happens on the court. He is also the web editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. A 2011 graduate of Columbia University’s Journalism School, he has previously worked for the New York Knicks, The Sporting News, Business Insider and other publications. His website is SprungOnSports.com. You can follow him on Twitter.

Tweet of the Night: Spurs Game 3 reaction

Leave a comment

The four-time NBA Champion San Antonio Spurs made a statement in Game 3 of the Western Conference Finals with a 104-93 victory in Memphis.

That statement might as well have been one of those old clichés like “never underestimate the heart of a champion.”

Spurs—new and old—expressed their enthusiasm on Twitter after the game.

Tweet of the Night: David Robinson doesn’t put Stephen Curry in his top 3 as a shooter

2 Comments

Stephen CurryBy now, it’s hard to argue with the notion that Stephen Curry is getting up there as one of the best shooters in the history of the NBA, if not already the best. His form is absolute purity, and the ability to shoot from anywhere puts fear into defenders anytime he gets past the halfcourt line. His shot single-handedly changes the way a team has to guard him and the Golden State Warriors entirely. Most of his peers watch him in awe.

The lone argument against the idea of saying “best ever” is that it’s still early in his career to anoint him as such. If you look at it in terms of accumulation, that’s certainly understandable – he has only played four seasons in the league.

One thing for certain is that no one that shoots as much as Curry does has ever shot anywhere near as good as him. His career-shooting mark of 44.6 percent from the 3-point line is bested only by Steve Kerr, who shot 45.4 percent in his 17-year career. Kerr shot a total of 1599 3-pointers in his career – 407 of those attempts came during two seasons when the 3-point line was shortened, when he shot an absurd 51.8 percent. The difference, of course, is the volume and the degree of difficulty in those shots. Kerr was a standstill shooter, who relied heavily on taking open shots while teammates created looks for him. Curry, as we’ve seen, creates many of his own opportunities with a hand in his face, and has already hit 644 3-pointers – just 82 behind 726 that Kerr made in his entire career.

Pages: 1 2

Hubbard: David Robinson went out a Champion in His Final Game

Leave a comment

In the fifth and final installment from his new book The History of the San Antonio Spurs (© Whitman Publishing, LLC), Sheridanhoops columnist Jan Hubbard (twitter: @whyhub) writes about what is arguably the greatest Spurs’ team ever – the only championship team that included Tim Duncan, David Robinson, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. (You can order the book here.) 

The story in 2003 wasn’t Parker or Ginobili. It wasn’t even Duncan, who was the first player since Michael Jordan to win consecutive Most Valuable Player awards.

Tweet of the Night: David Robinson

3 Comments

Will the Miami Heat lose another game this season?

With a nail-biting 105-103 victory against a surprisingly feisty Boston Celtics team that played without Kevin Garnett, the Miami Heat extended their ridiculous winning streak to 23 games – the second best streak ever in NBA history.

The team overcame a career night from Jeff Green, who had a whopping 43 points on 14-of-21 shooting – including 5-of-7 from the 3-point line and 10-of-13 from the stripe – along with seven rebounds, two assists, two steals and four blocks. Some of his highlights:

Pages: 1 2