StatBox Playoff Breakdown: Knicks lucky to be alive and how San Antonio eliminated Golden State

1 Comment

The conference finals should be set. If not for Indiana’s horrid Thursday night performance against the Knicks, San Antonio’s Game 6 victory over Golden State would have ended the NBA’s second round. How did the Spurs end up taking the final game of what looked like an incredibly tight and engaging series?

Knicks are lucky to still be alive

Miami Heat v Indiana Pacers - Game FourLet’s not sugarcoat this: The Knicks are lucky to be in the playoffs right now, and are only still alive because the Pacers laid a complete egg in Thursday night’s Game 5 at Madison Square Garden.

Indiana shot 36.2 percent, missed 14 free throws and committed 19 turnovers in its 85-75 loss to New York, one it will want back if it somehow loses the next two games (and the series) to the Knicks.

“We’ve just got to play more solid. There’s no other way to put it,” Pacers coach Frank Vogel said. That’s putting it mildly.

The Indiana frontcourt of Roy Hibbert, David West and Paul George shot a combined 17-for-42 and the Pacers still only lost by 10. The Knicks didn’t really help themselves in any way either. Consider these facts:

  • New York got VoluMelo instead of Carmelo Anthony, with the Knicks star shooting 12-for-28 from the field while only attempting four free throws.
  • Despite forcing 19 turnovers and finishing a plus-eight on that front, Indiana still scored more points off turnovers, 14, than the Knicks’ 12.
  • The Knicks were out-rebounded by three and took 16 fewer free throws than the Pacers, but won because Indiana totally coughed up the game.

woodson“I was totally impressed because we met the challenge,” Knicks coach Mike Woodson said. “I think as a coach you come into games like this and you want to see who’s going to step up and make plays, and I thought we did that tonight. We were the better team in terms of doing that.”

Did Woodson watch the same game everyone else did? The Knicks, other than Chris Copeland, who Woodson decided to finally play after exhausting all his other options, and Kenyon Martin were pretty dreadful offensively. J.R. Smith shot 4-for-11 and was praised for his strong performance, truly indicating that Smith’s standards have been lowered. Ima Shumpert shot 2-for-10, Pablo Prigioni has been marginalized, and the Knicks only won because no Indiana player shot better than 50 percent from the field besides for Ian Mahinmi, who hit both his field goal attempts.

The Knicks could choose to look at this game through rose-colored glasses, but it’s extremely unlikely that Indiana will play this poorly at home on Saturday night. Unless Woodson and his team get its act together, reality will quickly strike and end New York’s season. They’re truly fortunate to still be in this series.

How San Antonio eliminated Golden State

Stephen Curry On Sunday, Golden State seemed to have figured San Antonio out with a rousing overtime win to knot the series at two games apiece. Several Warriors were making crucial contributions, there was teamwork, balance and perseverance. Some Sheridan Hoops guy even wrote a column about how Golden State had a realistic chance of beating the vaunted Spurs.

So what changed over the last two games? Two key Golden State players basically ran out of gas.

As much as Stephen Curry has deserved the heaping helpings of praise he’s received this postseason, it was clear his ankle hindered the hobbling star enough to really affect the Warriors. Take a look at his splits from the first four games to the final two games of the series:

Curry Minutes FG % 3 FG % Points Assists FTA
Games 1-4 45.5 42.5 41 26 6.75 4.25
Games 5-6 37.5 35.9 20 15.5 7 0

Andrew Bogut Tim DuncanThe minutes played are distorted because of the two overtime games in the first four, but Curry’s huge drop-off in 3-point field goal percentage and points scored can be logically attributed to his ankle injuries. As sensational of a player Curry is, he needed to be the focal point of Golden State’s offense to have a chance to knock off the Spurs. He didn’t shoot a single free throw over the final two games, a stat that encapsulates his limitations on Tuesday and Thursday.

The other major factor in the Warriors’ demise is the Andrew Bogut injury finally catching up to him. “I was running on fumes the whole series,” Bogut told the AP after Game 6. After averaging 15.4 rebounds in his previous five games, Bogut was limited to just 40 total minutes in games five and six. After going 2-for-5 with 18 rebounds in Game 4, he went 2-for-5 with 13 total rebounds in the last two contests combined.

It was a tremendous series for Golden State, but injuries to Curry and Bogut caught up with them and ultimately led to the Warriors’ unfortunate ouster.

Shlomo Sprung loves advanced statistics and the way they explain what happens on the court. He is also the web editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. A 2011 graduate of Columbia University’s Journalism School, he has previously worked for the New York Knicks, The Sporting News, Business Insider and other publications. His website is SprungOnSports.com. You can follow him on Twitter.

SH Blog: Raptors, Sixers decide on GMs; Hollins declines credit for stopping Durant

Leave a comment

The Warriors knocked off the Spurs today to knot their series back up, 2-2. And they did it with Steph Curry on a balky ankle. Tomorrow night, the Thunder and Bulls will try to even up their series as well. If you know who’s going to win each of these series, you could probably make a fortune. The NBA future is about as unclear as it ever gets right about now.

For a couple teams, though, the future is getting a little clearer. Or at least the major players in that future. In today’s blog, we’ve got news on two NBA teams making up their minds on who will be their GM heading into the offseason. Before we start that, though, check out our Euroleague final report for a heads-up on what’s going on across the pond.

Now here’s all the latest news and rumors from around the NBA.

  • There’s a new boss in Philly: former Rockets assistant GM Sam Hinkie. John Mitchell of the Philadelphia Inquirer tells us a little about him: “One thing I’ve learned about Hinkie in the last 48 hours is that he’s not just all about crunching numbers. Yes, he’s big on ascribing value to shots taken at the basket vs. long two-pointers that should be threes, but perhaps there is more here. In three conversations with people in Houston who have worked with him and watched him work, the common thread is that while Hinkie and former boss Daryl Morey, the Houston general manager, have hired a slew of MIT MBAs to analyze everything, Hinkie is a relentless worker who will “scout talent as much as anyone in the league.” Hinkie joined the Rockets in 2005, two years before Morey did. During that time, the Rockets more than doubled their scouting department – not including advance scouts – to six.”
  • Kevin DurantThe Grizzlies are playing their style of basketball, and it’s been troubling the Thunder quite a bit so far. But Lionel Hollins is being modest about it, reports Jeff Caplan of NBA.com: ‘The reality of All-Star point guard Russell Westbrook – Allen’s more natural counterpart –being shelved is in full effect and it’s not pretty. The Grizzlies are doing all they can to grit-and-grind their way to making life as uncomfortable as possible for Durant, forcing his teammates to step up, and especially late in these games, each of which have been up for grabs in the final three minutes. “I’ve said it before, when a guy has the ball and has to score like that it takes energy, and the more you make him work, that’s the best you can do,” Grizzlies coach Lionel Hollins said. “You can’t stop Kevin Durant, he’s a great player, but he played 45, 46 minutes and he’s asked to carry a huge load for them. As the game goes on other people for them, they start taking the load away from him a little bit, but I don’t think that we can stop him. I’m not attributing it to us.” “

    Pages: 1 2

StatBox Playoff Breakdown: Knicks’ guards key big run and assertive Conley guides Grizzlies

Leave a comment

Tuesday night’s games were all about guard play and righting a set of wrongs from Game 1. The Knicks’ guards didn’t do enough to overshadow the strong play of Indiana’s frontcourt, but Pablo Prigioni helped New York rectify that problem during a historic fourth quarter run. And Memphis needed a boost from Mike Conley after a subpar Game 1 performance, and Conley redeemed himself during the Grizzlies’ huge Tuesday night road win. Let’s discuss these themes as part of the StatBox Playoff Breakdown:

Knicks exploit backcourt advantage
Prigioni featured imageAt the outset of the series, I wrote that both the Knicks and Pacers have advantages they will need to exploit in order to advance to the conference finals. Indiana’s big men led the team to a big Game 1 road win, but it was New York’s guard play that gave the Knicks a resounding 105-79 Game 2 win on Tuesday night.

While the Knicks had an incredible six turnovers all game as a team, and finally got a relatively efficient shooting night from Carmelo Anthony, the key Indiana trio of Paul George, David West and Roy Hibbert combined for 11 of the team’s 21, seven of them from George himself! The turnovers and dip in production from the Pacers’ best players were key factors in their loss.

Pacers Frontcourt FG % Points TO FTA
Game 1 50 53 9 15
Game 2 50 39 11 8

The Knicks’ three-guard lineup of Pablo Prigioni, Raymond Felton and Iman Shumpert paid dividends in Game 2, after an average first game. It was Prigioni and Felton who helped key a 30-2 run in the third and fourth quarters to turn this contest into a laugher.

“I think I was trying to make a statement,” said Shumpert. “I just wanted to win this game real bad. We needed this game.”

Besides for the volume-shooting enigma J.R. Smith, Shumpert, Prigioni and Felton were guards who were instrumental in New York’s bounce-back win. Look at what those three did in Game 2 compared to Sunday’s series opener:

Knicks Key Guards FG % 3 FG % Points Assists Rebounds TO
Game 1 50 40 29 10 6 4
Game 2 66.7 71.4 39 10 12 1

Since it will be hard to deal with Indiana’s size, the Knicks will have to compensate with top-level play from their starting guards in order to win three more games in this series.

Memphis needs Conley the Conquerer
Mike Conley
In the food chain of NBA point guards, there’s no question that Russell Westbrook was the predator to the prey who is Mike Conley. Exit Westbrook and enter Reggie Jackson and a huge advantage for Memphis in this series. If the Grizzlies would get the Alpha Conley in this series, they would have a good chance of winning it. Alpha Conley, or Conley the Conquerer, did not show up in Game 1, but he sure did in Tuesday night’s Game 2 win.

“We needed to have somebody on the perimeter do something,” said Memphis Head Coach Lionel Hollins. He started getting to the basket a little bit and scored some big jump shots late.”

Conley was far from his assertive self in Game One, but really took the intiative in Game 2 and really willed the Grizzlies to a 99-93 win.

Conley FG % Points Assists Rebounds TO
Game 1 33.3 13 3 5 2
Game 2 50 26 9 10 2

“The last game, we didn’t execute down the stretch, didn’t get the stops when we needed them and tonight we did vice-versa,” Conley said. “We got the stops, got the rebounds, made big shots and free throws.”

Conley, whom Tony Allen called a top-five point guard after the game, can talk about the stops and the rebounds all he wants, but it was his assertiveness and overall conquistadorian nature that guided Memphis to an enormous win that could set them up quite well for the duration of this series. If Conley continues,

Shlomo Sprung loves advanced statistics and the way they explain what happens on the court. He is also the web editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. A 2011 graduate of Columbia University’s Journalism School, he has previously worked for the New York Knicks, The Sporting News, Business Insider and other publications. His website is SprungOnSports.com. You can follow him on Twitter.

Knicks-Pacers Preview: Five Key Factors

4 Comments

JR SmithIf lessons have been learned, we should not expect the Knicks to dress in all-black, we should not expect Mike Woodson to be kept in the dark about his players’ pre-game plans, and we should not know what to expect — good or bad on any given night, no telling which will come when — from J.R. Smith.

We also should not expect a suspension for Smith for throwing a flagrant elbow.

But then again, when you are playing against a team that plays a self-proclaimed style known as “smashmouth basketball,” maybe we actually should expect a hothead moment from the most volatile player on the court (apologies to Kenyon Martin).

The Knicks and Pacers open their second-round series Sunday afternoon after getting the pesky Celtics and Hawks out of the way on a Friday night that turned into an elimination night as New York, Indiana, Memphis and Oklahoma City all avoided the prospect of playing a Game 7.

Unlike those lucky fellows in Miami and San Antonio, there will be no extended rest period for any of those teams. The rust factor does not apply here. Nor does the rest factor.

So what factors will be the keys to this series, which was a terrific rivalry a generation ago when Reggie Miller was a player, not a broadcaster, and when Spike Lee’s courtside seats cost a fraction of what they cost now. Here they are:

  1. The ‘Melo Prefix Factor: What hashtag will be most associated with the NBA’s leading scorer during the regular season? Will it be #IsoMelo? Will it be #VolumMelo? If it is either of the two, don’t expect this to be a cakewalk for the Knicks. When the ball moves, New York can be an extremely dangerous offensive team. Tyson Chandler is one of the best pick-and-roll finishers in the game, Pablo Prigioni has gained the trust of his employers and is not only a terrific passer, but has shown himself to be a clutch shooter and a prime candidate to steal at least one lazy inbounds pass per night. Jason Kidd has been slumping, but he has broken out of slumps before. If all those parts are working as part of the offense, good things will happen for the Knicks. If the ball gets into Anthony’s hands and stops, bad things will happen. He is most productive when he gets his buckets within the flow of the offense. But when he gets the ball and all other movement ceases, bad things happen more often than good. Ball movement equals success. Stagnation equals elimination.
  2. The David West Factor: Indiana’s free agent-to-be just got finished finishing off the Atlanta Hawks and their free-agent-to-be PF, Josh Smith, whose likely final game as a member of the Hawks was a well-chronicled microcosm of his career in this fine column. I pity the fool who decides it makes more sense to make a strong run at Smith than it does to go hard after West, whose game trumps Smith’s in every area except cool nicknames. But if one of the two is to be judged the smoover, the vote here goes to Indiana’s PF, who rarely has an inefficient night. No, he is not as athletic as Josh. But you know what? Athleticism can be overrated. I’ll take calm, cool and collected any day. Somebody has to keep West off the boards, and unless Woodson goes with a big lineup of Tyson Chandler at center and Kenyon Martin at the 4, that somebody is probably going to be Anthony — which means he’ll be exerting every bit as much effort on defense as he will on offense. How will that translate into what Anthony will be able to do on the offensive end of the court? Good question. That’s why it’s a key factor.
  3. The Tempo Factor. The Knicks are old, but they prefer to play fast. The Pacers are quite young by comparison, but they like to play at 78 RPM. (Ask your granddad). In their final two games against Atlanta, they held the Hawks to 83 and then 73 points. When they played the Knicks during the regular season, they held New York to 88, 76, 91 and 90 points as the teams split the season series. In a 125-91 victory on Feb. 20, the Pacers had their highest point total of the season (they ranked 23rd in points and 28th in assists but 1st in rebounding). If the Knicks can manage to score 100 points in any game, it should be their magic number. If the games are played in the 80s and 90s, it’ll likely come down to execution in the final 3 minutes. Which leads us back to Factor #1 — will the Knicks move the ball on critical late possessions, or will they clear out and let ‘Melo try to carry them?
  4. The My Award Is Better Than Your Award Factor: We already knew that J.R. Smith runs hot-and-cold more than a broken faucet. It has been that was throughout his career, and he ran hot enough times during the year to earn the Sixth Man Award. But he also missed his first 10 shots in the Knicks’ ill-advised, ill-executed all-black garb Game 5 against the Celtics, and he made only one 3-point shot in the closeout win over Boston. What we didn’t realize about Paul George, the NBA’s Most Improved Player, is how hot and cold he can run. In Game 1 against Atlanta, he had a triple-double of 23 points, 12 rebounds and 11 assists, getting to the FT line 18 times. In the closeout Game 6, he had four points in 44 minutes, missed all five of his 3-point attempts, didn’t get to the line once and was outscored by teammate Tyler Hansbrough, who played 6 minutes. Both teams have other guys who can score. But the Pacers need consistency from George more than the Knicks need it from Smith if they are going to make it out of this round.
  5. The Jason Kidd Factor: To repeat, he is not a point guard anymore. He is a spot-up 3-point shooter, and he has a knack for knocking down daggers late in games. He is a veteran presence in the locker room, one of the coolest heads in the league, but he is a shell of the player he once was — and he is slumping. In the series against the Celtics, he shot 3-for-17. He has gone four straight games without making a 3-pointer — a huge factor because the old man took 79 percent of his field goal attempts from behind the arc during the regular season. How many times during the season did he go four straight games without making a single 3-pointer? None. Undoubtedly, unquestionably (to me) the x-factor for the Knicks. Too much Smith and not enough Kidd (assuming Kidd breaks out of this slump) is not a good thing for New York. Balance from the two of them? It’ll make all the difference.

PREDICTIONS: 

 SHERIDAN: Knicks in 7.

HUBBARD: Pacers in 6.

HEISLER: Knicks in 6.

BERNUCCA: Knicks in 7.

HAMILTON: Knicks in 6.

PERKINS: Knicks in 6.

schayesSCHAYES: Knicks in 7.

andykamenetzkyANDY KAMENETZKY: Pacers in 6.

briankamenetskyBRIAN KAMENETZKY: Pacers in 7.

ZAGORIA: Knicks in 6.

PARK: Knicks in 7.

OTHER PREVIEWS

CHI-MIA  |  GSW-SA  | MEM-OKC

StatBox Playoff Breakdown: Melo hurting Knicks, Pacers defense perseveres and Thunder in trouble

1 Comment

Can a team win with its star player only scoring one point per shot? It’s not going so well over the past few games for Carmelo Anthony and the Knicks. Which players drive the Pacers in its incredibly volatile series against Atlanta? Can Oklahoma City win with Reggie Jackson as its second option on offense. We’re going behind the numbers from Wednesday night’s trio of Game Fives in today’s StatBox playoff breakdown.

Knicks won’t win with VoluMelo
Carmelo_Anthony
The Knicks let a veteran team like the Celtics hang around on Wednesday in Boston’s 92-86 win and gain some confidence going into Friday night’s Game 6. The Knicks shot under 40 percent, and a lot of that has to do with the inefficient play of its best player.

The New York Knicks have a superstar player in Carmelo Anthony when he’s an efficient shooter and passer out of double teams. There seems to only a slight difference in Anthony’s performance in wins and losses during the regular season, but it’s enough of a difference to point out some tendencies.

Carmelo Anthony Shots FG % 3 FG % Points Rebounds FTA FT %
Wins 21.8 46.5 39.6 29 6.7 7.5 83.5
Losses 23.2 41.4 34.1 28 7.2 8 81.9

In losses, Anthony takes more shots at a pedestrian percentage across the board. The higher rebounding and free throw attempt numbers are due to his increased minutes in losses (39.2) rather than wins (36.1). What the Knicks have seen from its best player over the last three games is something/someone I call VoluMelo. He’s become a volume shooter who’s basketball-monopolizing approach hurts the team.

It doesn’t take a mathematical savant to realize that a player isn’t being efficient when he’s taking as many shots as the points he scores. In the last three games, Anthony scored 84 points on 84 shots. That’s really, really bad, considering shots are worth two or three points and there are free throws, as well. Anthony scored 70 points on 53 shots in the first two games, and even that’s not amazing.

“I told you from Game 1 that this wasn’t going to be a breeze. It wasn’t going to be a walk in the park. Them guys were going to fight and they’re showing some fight right now,” Anthony said. “They threw a couple punches at us now and it’s time for us to do the same.”

The way Anthony is shooting, he seems to be throwing a punch or two at his own team. Until New York gets Melo instead of VoluMelo, the Knicks are going to be in deep trouble against the Celtics.

Panicked Pacers persevere
Roy Hibbert, Al Horford
After squandering a 2-0 series lead, the Indiana Pacers were panicking. But in Wednesday’s Game 5, Indiana went back to what got them the Eastern Conference’s third seed: elite level defense and other-worldly efficiency from the frontcourt.

It was a defensive tour-de-force in the Pacers’ 106-83 win, limiting the Hawks to 33.3 percent shooting. Josh Smith, Al Horford and Jeff Teague combined to shoot 13- for-46 from the field. On the other hand, the Indiana frontcourt trio of Roy Hibbert, David West and Paul George shot 21-for-31 as part of a Pacer offense that shot 50.7 percent from the floor.

“This is the first time that I felt like we’ve played true defense in this series,” West said. “I thought everyone came in and stayed with the game plan in terms of being aggressive, and our hands were active and we just made plays on the defensive end.”

As you’ll see in this nice info-graphic, the Pacers go as far as Hibbert, West and George take them:

Pacer Frontcourt FG % Points Rebounds FTA Plus/Minus
Game 1 39 52 28 21 43
Game 2 48.6 49 18 19 45
Game 3 42.4 42 24 16 -20
Game 4 41.5 50 25 15 -8
Game 5 67.7 63 24 23 64

When the trio got aggressive and went to the free throw line at least 19 times, they won. Whenever the players had a positive plus/minus, Indiana won. If the Pacers want to close out the Hawks in Game 6 and win the first road game of the series, you’ll know where to look for Indiana’s production.

Are the thin Thunder in trouble?
Reggie_Jackson
Russell Westbrook is injured. James Harden is on the other team. So who’s the second option for the Oklahoma City Thunder besides Kevin Durant? Reggie Jackson took the second most shots on the team in Wednesday’s 107-100 loss to Houston that was troublesome for the West’s second seed top seed to say the very least.

Kevin Martin shot 1-for-10 and the OKC bench scored a total of 19 points on 23 shots. Even without Jeremy Lin on Wednesday, Houston went eight deep and got a combined 32 points from afterthoughts Francisco Garcia and Patrick Beverley. During the regular season, Jackson took 4.6 shots per game. During the postseason, that average is up to 10 attempts per contest and rising. Jackson is not a second scoring option for a playoff team. It’s that simple.

Serge Ibaka shot 6-for-14 in the Game 5 defeat, and he and Martin need to many more touches if the Thunder plan on advancing to the second round against either the Clippers or Grizzlies. If not, the team’s management may be kicking itself for sacrificing its short-term depth with Harden.

Shlomo Sprung loves advanced statistics and the way they explain what happens on the court. He is also the web editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. A 2011 graduate of Columbia University’s Journalism School, he has previously worked for the New York Knicks, The Sporting News, Business Insider and other publications. His website is SprungOnSports.com. You can follow him on Twitter.