Lithuania-Dominican and Russia-Nigeria today for 2 Olympic spots

1 Comment

The Greeks are out, Bo McCalebb is out, J.J. Barea and Carlos Arroyo are out, and there won’t be any Angolans to elbow around at the 2012 Olympic men’s basketball tournament.

On a day of wild swings and finishes at the quarterfinals of the Olympic qualifying tournament in Caracas, Venezuela,  the field of Olympic contenders was reduced to four — Russia, the Dominican Republic, Nigeria and Lithuania.

Two spots will be determined in today’s semifinals, with both of those teams going into Team USA’s group. The losers will play Sunday for the final berth.

The upset of the day belonged to Nigeria, which defeated Greece 80-79.

From FIBA.com: “An unlikely cameo from Ade Dagunduro has delivered Nigeria one of the most memorable victories in international basketball history and put one Nigerian foot into the London Olympics. After scoring just 19 points in the tournament to that point, the 1.95m guard nailed his country’s last seven points to secure a thrilling 80-79 Quarter-Final win over Greece. First Dagunduro hit a mid-range jumper with 70 seconds remaining from an Ike Diogu offensive rebound, and then a pull-up three-pointer with the shot clock winding down to reclaim a two-point lead with 30 seconds to play. After Kostas Papanikolaou nailed a triple of his own with 14 seconds left, Dagunduro then drove to the basket and drew a foul on Nikolas Zisis. To the delight of the deafening Nigerian fans, he slotted both free throws and then blocked Vassilis Spanoulis’ game-winning three-point attempt to spark wild mid-court celebrations. While Dagunduro’s 14 points were the icing on the cake, Ike Diogu (17 points, 12 rebounds) was the rock of Gibraltar. Al-Farouq Aminu (13 points, 5 rebounds) was also important, making repeated big plays throughout the game. For Greece, Spanoulis (25 points, 7 rebounds, 5 assists) was the star but only Ioannis Bourousis (18 points, 5 rebounds) and Georgios Printezis (10 points) made it to double figures in support. Video highlights:

The comeback of the quarterfinals belonged to the Dominicans, who erased a 20-point second-quarter deficit to defeat Macedonia 86-76 despite 35 points from former University of New Orleans guard Bo McCalebb.

From FIBA.com: “The game appeared out of reach when the trailed by 20 points with four minutes to play in the second quarter, but a crucial 11-4 run to end the half opened the door for a revival. The hot shooting of Francisco Garcia then made the second half one to remember for their large band of travelling fans. Garcia finished with 28 points, 21 coming after halftime. Al Horford (14 points, 15 rebounds) overcame a horror first half through his hustle on the boards, while Jack-Michael Martinez (14 points, 13 rebounds), Ronald Ramon (13 points) and Elpidio Fortuna (9 points, 7 rebounds) all made valuable contributions at both ends. … The Dominican Republic opened the second half with a 12-2 run that brought the score to 43-40 and crowd to fever pitch, only to watch MKD extend the margin back to nine points. A Ramon three-pointer closed the gap to three but McCalebb immediately answered in kind. It wasn’t until Horford – who was 1-of-10 at three-quarter time – finally connected on a jump shot with 8:46 left in the fourth term that his team claimed the lead. From there Garcia made the game his own, scoring 10 points for the quarter as the Dominicans showed great poise.

After spraining his ankle in the previous game, Timofey Mozgov was sidelined for Russia. But David Blatt’s team held Angola to five second-quarter points to move on with an 80-65 victory over Angola.

From FIBA.com: “Perennial go-to man Andrei Kirilenko (14 points, 5 rebounds, 5 assists) was once again irresistible, pouring in nine first quarter points to help build a lead from which the Angolans never looked likely to come back.
With Kirilenko involved in almost every play, Vitaliy Fridzon (18 points) and Alexander Kaun (17) provided much of what remained of the scoring with Mozgov absence barely noticeable. In spite of a powerful showing by Eduardo Mingas (20) and solid displays by guards Armando Costa (10) and Carlos Morais (14) the Angolans struggled to cope with the strong Russian low post play. In game that will be remembered for some great inside play and some very mediocre three point shooting, the Russians once again lived up to their reputation of one of the best defensive units and most tactically solid teams in international basketball.”

Finally, the perennial European powerhouse from Lithuania got a crucial play from veteran Sarunas Jasikevicius in the final minute to defeat Puerto Rico 76-72.

From FIBA.com: “Puerto Rico had several opportunities to draw clear in the first half, leading by eight and six in the first and second quarters respectively thanks to the inside-out combination of JJ Barea and Peter John Ramos. But they could not string together baskets at the crucial time, whereas Martynas Pocius and Maciulis hit important buckets to keep Lithuania close. With the Europeans being awarded 15 free three throws in the final 6:11 of the second quarter they took a 40-38 halftime lead. In contrast, it was Lithuania who couldn’t break away in the third quarter despite controlling play. A spectacular Arroyo fade-away and a Galindo triple allowed Puerto Rico to reduce a seven-point  deficit to just two at the final break. The story was the same in the final term, Lithuania out by seven before Arroyo and Galindo struck again to reduce the gap to one with 4:50 to play. When Arroyo hit his second triple the crowd erupted and the Americans (sic) had their first lead since the second quarter. In a gripping finale, Jasikevicius made his strong move to put his team up by one before a wild pass from Barea (5/15 field goals, 3 turnovers) robbed his team of a potentially game-winning shot.

Hubbard: Criticism of Mavericks makes little sense

3 Comments

If you live in an area other than Dallas, Texas, you probably are not aware that if the Mavericks had brought back their team of a year ago, they would have won their second consecutive NBA title.

Yes, that is correct.

Add Tyson Chandler, J.J. Barea and DeShawn Stevenson to the Mavericks roster, and instead of being swept by Oklahoma City in the first round, the Mavericks would have won in six games at the most, maybe five like last year and, well, hell, they might have swept the Thunder.

At least that is what we hear from local eggheads.

I might be tempted to point out that with Chandler, the Knicks went from 42-40 last season to 36-30 this season. They were swept in the first round last year and will leave the playoffs after winning one time this year.

Minnesota and New Jersey did not make the playoffs last year and after adding Barea and Stevenson, they didn’t make the playoffs this year.

Yes, you say, but you’re missing the point. Each of the three added an important element to the Mavericks’ title team from last season. They were part of a delicate chemistry that was disrupted when they were allowed to leave.

And I answer back by saying that perhaps you do not understand the fundamental difference between the following two items:

1. A championship team.

2. A team that wins a championship.

On a national scale, the Mavericks were never viewed as one great teams in NBA history. There were no comparisons with Magic’s Lakers, Larry’s Celtics, Michael’s Bulls or Duncan’s Spurs.

To be accurate, the Mavericks didn’t have the best talent last year. Kobe’s Lakers had far more talent. So did Miami, San Antonio, Boston, Chicago and maybe even Orlando.

The Mavericks were more in line with the 2004 Pistons team that featured Chauncey Billups, Richard Hamilton, Tayshaun Prince and Ben and Rasheed Wallace. It is doubtful that any of those players will be in the Hall of Fame, but they played Hall of Fame team basketball and won the title.

That’s what the Mavericks did last season when they swept a superior Lakers team in the second round and in the process gave credibility to all the pertinent clichés – captured lightning in a bottle, clicked on all cylinders, put it together at the right time.

Consider some of the aberrations in that series – Jason Terry shot 59 percent from the field and 68 percent from 3-point range. Peja Stojakovic shot 52 percent from 3-point range and averaged 12.5 points. Two series later against Miami, Stojakovic was so ineffective that he played 26 minutes during the 6-game series.

And then in the Finals, they faced a Miami team that had a larger number of superstars in their prime, but who were surviving on talent rather than teamwork. The Mavericks entered the series as a confident group and, well, they were on a roll.

To think that would happen exactly the same way this year is foolish, and the Mavericks did in fact offer Chandler and Barea one-year deals. Perhaps Stevenson would have signed a one-year contract, but the Mavericks felt they upgraded that spot on the roster by signing Delonte West.

But Chandler and Barea wanted multi-year deals, and with the new collective bargaining agreement going into effect, the Mavericks would have paralyzed themselves for at least four years.

TNT’s Steve Kerr last worked as a general manager for the Phoenix Suns. His knowledge of the game and the implications of the salary cap are unsurpassed. He pointed out during a telecast that if the Mavericks had signed Chandler et al, they would have been gambling they could compete at a very high level for several years.

But if they were wrong, they would have been locked in to their roster. They would have had no options.

That is where the Knicks find themselves. They already used their amnesty provision. They have big money players in Carmelo Anthony and Amar’e Stoudemire. They are all but bereft of draft picks. They added Chandler at $15 million a year. They have no roster flexibility going forward unless they trade one of the big names. Mavericks owner Mark Cuban and general manager Donnie Nelson did not want to be in that position.

The Mavericks have two players – Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Kidd – who will be in the Hall of Fame, but Kidd is 39 and more suited for a backup role. And the humorous part of some of the criticism Cuban receives is that some of the people who rip him are the same people who were saying at this time last year – believe it or not – that Devin Harris was better than Kidd and that the Mavericks made a mistake trading Harris.

Think the Mavericks could have won a title without Jason Kidd?

It is understandable if every once in a while, Cuban gets a little testy with the press, although the mistake he makes is to lump everyone together. There is a large difference between those who understand what he tried to do in turning the team over, and those who simply talk before they think.

“I’ve heard some of the talking headless (media being critical),” Cuban said when he met reporters before the Game 4 loss to the Thunder. “. . .  (T)hose who are talking otherwise haven’t read the CBA and are just talking out their (expletive) without any foundation. But that’s what you guys do. Given what happened, I think we put together a damn good team. If we had one break, one call, one bounce, we’re having a completely different conversation and you’re thinking how smart we are instead of how stupid we are.”

For the record, Cuban wasn’t being stupid. Nor was he simply trying to save money. But he had no idea – no one did – that Lamar Odom would fail as spectacularly as he did. No doubt that Odom had some personal issues that troubled him, but, well, he wimped out on his team. No one saw that coming.

With Odom at his Sixth Man of the Year best, the Mavericks would have been far more competitive. They likely would have had a higher seed and perhaps even home court advantage in the first playoff round. But when Odom played with such indifference, the Mavericks sent him away. The result was they had a much weaker team than it looked like they would have at the beginning of the season.

No, Cuban can’t be accused of being stupid. But he was gambling. And with any gamble – even one where the odds look great – much can go wrong.

Cuban had a not-so-secret goal of surrounding Dirk Nowitzki with free agents Deron Williams and Dwight Howard. That won’t happen because Howard is signed for an option year in Orlando. Even if he is traded, the Mavericks do not have the assets to acquire him.

And lately, there have been rumblings that Dallas-native Williams will move with the Nets to Brooklyn. So Cuban could find himself in a total rebuilding mode.

But throughout his tenure in Dallas, he has demonstrated that he is capable of building and rebuilding on the fly. He made a huge mistake letting Steve Nash leave as a free agent and got nothing in return in 2003. Yet by 2006, he had his team in the NBA Finals.

During a period of four seasons from 2007 to 2010, the Mavericks lost in the first round three times and won only one playoff series. Cuban and Nelson remained patient, added Chandler and Stevenson, and the team won a title.

In allowing Chandler, Barea and Stevenson to depart, Cuban looked to the future rather than the present. He took a gamble, like doubling down on an 11 in black jack.

Ultimately he may have been dealt a deuce, but it was a bet that made sense. The Mavericks overachieved last year in winning the first title in franchise history. A streaking team can win one championship. Only great teams win two straight.

Jan Hubbard has written about basketball since 1976 and worked in the NBA league office for eight years in between media stints. Follow him on Twitter at @whyhub.

Hubbard column: Mavericks have a devil of a decision to make

6 Comments

Although Greed holds a prominent position among the Seven Deadly Sins, there are times when it is a virtuous endeavor. Take the desire for multiple championships, for instance.

The Celtics have 17. The Lakers franchise has 16.

They want more.

In those cases, no one can argue – Greed is good.

Last year, the Dallas Mavericks played the 31st season in franchise history. They were a little more than a decade removed from residing in the inferno of the ’90s – a period when they never managed a .500 record and had seasons of 11, 13, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 victories.

They  got their first title and it was a joyous affair – a resurrection of sorts, particularly for Dirk Nowitzki, who made fools of all those who stupidly claimed he was soft. Nowitzki and the Mavericks entered the playoffs with as poor of a reputation as any team that had won 50 or more games for 11 consecutive seasons could possibly have. It was popular to predict they would lose in the first round to Portland.

They didn’t.

Then they were supposed to lose in the second round to the two-time defending champions. Instead, they swept the Lakers in four games, sending Kobe Bryant into a funk and Phil Jackson into, presumably, the nearest monastery to meditate.

A young Oklahoma City team lasted five games and then the Mavericks became Cleveland’s (and most of the rest of North America’s) Team by defeating the Evil Empire known as LeBron James and the Miami Heat.

So now they are defending champions, an achievement chronicled nicely in a new e-book by Eddie Sefko, the Mavericks beat writer for the Dallas Morning News. One title, of course, is wonderful. Guarantee any team that hasn’t won a championship one trophy and owners, executives, coaches and players alike will sell their souls to get it.

But now, one more is not enough. They want many. Call it Greed if you must, but it’s all-consuming – and it creates a dilemma.

How best to get more than one? Bring back every player from last season and hope for a repeat? Or is there a better way that might lead to multiple championships?