Bernucca column: This is not your father’s lockout

7 Comments

OK, the NBA is back. Now what will it look like?

In the days leading up to Christmas – and likely through the first month of a truncated season – there will be a fair amount of hand-wringing about the quality of play. Gloom-and-doom purists will reference the last lockout preceding the 1998-99 season, which by any measure was not among the NBA’s brightest days.

In that forgettable season, the NBA was replete with quickly formed teams made up of poorly conditioned players playing an unforgiving schedule. That three-headed monster exposed a league that had outgrown many of its rules. And the second retirement of Michael Jordan left the NBA without its beacon who could always put a glow on the mounting pile of garbage.

By any measure, those arguments are irrefutable. The game’s pace was the slowest ever recorded. Offense plummeted to its lowest point in decades, with a scoring champion who missed three of every five shots he took. The Finals between the Spurs and Knicks were the basketball equivalent of watching paint dry, borne out by TV ratings that dropped a staggering 33 percent from an all-time high of 18.7 the previous year.

As in 1999, there is still just a month of prep time, the proposed schedule is nearly as challenging and Jordan remains retired. So there are certainly some parallels between now and 13 years ago to allow those told-you-so arguments to be heard again.

To which we say, hogwash. The NBA’s financial system was not nearly as broken as owners wanted us to believe, and the product isn’t, either.

As a whole, the players are better than ever – yes, better than ever – unshackled by recent rules changes tilted toward ball and player movement that have offense on a steady rise over the last decade. Free throw and 3-point percentage are at or near the highest rates ever.

Two new trade rules in the new CBA

8 Comments

Okay, we’ve already discussed the amnesty provision and the stretch exception, two new pieces of the NBA’s pending collective bargaining agreement.

Time to look a little further. Here are two cool things, especially for those of you who feast on player movement and possible trades.

1. It will be easier to make trades. Under the old labor agreement, the salaries of the traded players had to be within 125 percent (plus 100K) of each other. That will remain the case for taxpaying teams, but the new agreement also makes it muuuuch easier for non-tax teams to swing uneven trades. For those teams, it is 150 percent (plus 100K) of the salaries being traded, or the 100 percent of the salaries being traded plus $5 million. The limit on the amount of cash that can be included in a trade remains $3 million — but teams are now limited to trading $3 million in cash per season. So you can’t just dump $3 million into every trade as you could in the past.

Stretch exception means bad contracts could proliferate under new CBA

9 Comments

The hot topic right now in the NBA is the amnesty provision of the new collective bargaining agreement.

The next thing to take a closer look at is the stretch exception, which is a mechanism that is designed to give relief to teams that make mistakes once the new collective bargaining agreement goes into effect. (The stretch exception does NOT apply to contracts signed under the old CBA).

Here is the exact wording regarding the stretch exception from the memo that was sent to teams by the league office. Sam Amick of SI.com obtained a copy and posted it online.

“For new contracts, salary of waived players to be “stretched” for cash purposes such that the player’s remaining protected compensation would be paid over twice the number of remaining contract years plus 1 year.

“In lieu of the usual cap treatment, the waiving tam may elect to have the waived player’s salary follow the stretched cash allocation, except that stretching a waived player’s salary for cap purposes is not permitted where the portion of total team salary attributable to all waived players in any future season would exceed an agreed upon percentage of the salary cap in effect during the season in which a player is waived.”

That second paragraph basically means there will be limits to prevent teams from abusing the stretch exception.

But as a practical matter, what I see happening is teams overpaying for marginal players, knowing that they can dump a guy owed $10 million in the final year of his contract if it is only going to count as $3.33 million against the cap in the ensuing three years.

For example, let’s say there are two teams bidding for the services of Kris Humphries, who is a free agent in more ways than one. 

Team A is willing to give Humphries a three-year contract starting at $8 million. With 4.5 percent annual raises, Hump would have an offer of $25.08 million sitting on the table.

Guest Column: Twitter’s fascinating role in the lockout

2 Comments

(Readers: When the news came just after 3 a.m. today that the NBA lockout had been settled, there was no live TV coverage of the announcement, no streaming video on the Internet. The only place to get the news was Twitter, through updates from reporters in the room covering the news briefing. In this age of instant communications, it was another fascinating glimpse into the power of the 140-character communication tool.-CS)

By Ryan Spoon of www.ryanspoon.com

Sports fans got a Black Friday present: The 149-day lockout was on the verge of ending.

And the result is a good thing for fans: the season will be 66 games (a better result than the normal 82!), result in greater league parity (ala the NFL), lead to a healthier league (good for everyone), and create a whirlwind December free agency period (the surprisingly great outcome of the NFL lockout).

The lockout was painful, mismanaged on both sides and generally could have been avoided… or at least handled far differently and far earlier. But the 2011-2012 season is saved and hopefully goodness comes from the ugly.

One of the most interesting and overlooked aspects was the role Twitter played in a world where:

- players couldn’t communicate with the league

- players themselves were not entirely knowledgeable of the latest events / outcomes

- both sides were feeling significant pressure from the public (pressure is a soft word here for disgust for most and hate for some)

- both sides were starved for communication outlets

So everyone took the Twitter: the league, the owners and the players. Some were trying to position themselves, some trying to save face and others trying to voice their opinion in a public manner (since it wasn’t being heard privately). Fascinating.

So why Twitter was so important here? First, the NBA and its players could feel the public’s disgust… far more publicly. In prior strikes / lockouts, the fans didn’t have as much power as they do today. And in prior situations, nobody had the outlets they do today: players and owners were able to immediately express frustration, anger, etc… and to huge audiences. The result was a very public negotiation that made many of those involved come across as confused, desperate, disjointed and/or displeased.

Nevertheless, it provided a platform for all constituents to amplify their voice… and to listen. And while that was debatably an effective / ineffective exercise – it was terrifically powerful for the fans.

Here are some examples:

Miami Heat owner Micky Arison (@mickyarison) took to Twitter to express his thankfulness to his fans. This was retweeted by the NBA (@nba). Takeaway: comes across as desperate.

NBA player Luis Scola (@lscola4) took to Twitter at a time when there was debate within the players union as to whether they should pass the league’s proposal.

BULLETIN: Deal reached to end NBA lockout

9 Comments

NEW YORK — A handshake deal is in place, and the NBA season is set to begin on Christmas Day.

David Stern and Billy Hunter announced a tentative agreement to end the NBA lockout shortly before 4 a.m. Saturday in a small conference room at a law firm in the General Motors Building in Manhattan.

Gentlemen, start your engines!

The settlement, first reported by Ken Berger of CBSSports.com, came on the 149th day of the work stoppage that forced the postponement of the regular season. On the 25th day of collective bargaining meetings between the two sides, the framework of the deal was agreed to after 15 hours of talks.

The handshake deal effectively ends the players’ anti-trust suit against the owners, as well as the owners’ lawsuit against the players which was filed over the summer.

“We’ve reached a tentative understanding that is subject to a variety of approvals,” commissioner David Stern said. “We’re optimistic that will all come to pass and the season will begin on Dec. 25, Christmas Day, with a tripleheader.”

The sides announced no details, although Stern said the Christmas tripleheader will include the same games that were originally scheduled for Dec. 25 — Miami at Dallas, Boston-New York and the Chicago Bulls against the Los Angeles Lakers.